Don't just get a score. See exactly where AI left its fingerprints and how to fix them.
GPTZero, Originality.ai, Turnitin tell you "87% AI probability". Then what? You stare at your text guessing which parts are the problem.
Sentence-by-sentence scanning across 6 dimensions including rhythm analysis. We show you exactly which sentence has what problem and how to fix it.
Fix the issues, then run your text through any detector you trust. We don't lock you in. Detection + pinpointing + suggestions, all in one step.
Find the sentences a teacher would flag, fix them yourself, keep your own voice.
Open guide →FOR TEACHERSSentence-level markers you can discuss with a student instead of a number you have to defend.
Open guide →FOR ESSAYSFormal writing is not the problem. Uniform paragraphs and stacked hedges are.
Open guide →FOR BLOG POSTSKill the stock openers, vary the rhythm, add the one story only you can tell.
Open guide →Yes. Unlimited checks, up to 5,000 characters each, with no account and nothing stored. The Humanizer works on the same limits.
No detector is 100% accurate, including ours, and anyone who says otherwise is selling you a number. That is why we do not stop at a score: every issue we flag comes with the sentence, the marker we found, and a fix. You judge the evidence.
Vocabulary, Structure, Tone, Punctuation, Logic and Rhythm. The first five are what a good editor checks. Rhythm is our own: sentence-length variance, paragraph uniformity, dialogue that never wastes a word, flat tension curves.
AI models write sentences of remarkably similar length and paragraphs of similar shape. Humans do not. We measure that variance across the whole text, which is why we catch long-form pieces that word-level detectors miss.
Usually the score drops in any detector, because the real markers are gone. But we are an editor, not a bypass tool. We do not promise a number, and we will not help you hide AI use where you are required to disclose it.
No. Text is processed in memory for the duration of the check and discarded. Nothing is stored or used for training.
Yes. Formal register is not treated as an AI marker. Forced symmetry, stacked hedging and stock transitions are, and those show up in bad academic writing whether or not a model wrote it.
This tool is for English. A Chinese version with the same six dimensions runs at detect.ilang.cn.